- Small Business Trends - http://smallbiztrends.com -
No More Phrase and Exact Keyword Match in AdWords
Posted By Larry Kim On August 21, 2014 @ 8:00 am In Marketing Tips | 9 Comments
Holy smokes! Google has effectively killed off  both the Exact and Phrase keyword match types in AdWords.
While the keyword match types will still exist, starting in September, AdWords is redefining the definition of how keywords set to phrase and exact keyword match type will trigger search ads by applying close variant keyword matching . Meaning, your keywords will also trigger for misspellings, singular/plural forms, stemmings, accents, acronyms and abbreviations of the keywords that you specify.
Close variant keyword match was introduced  in 2012, and was already the default option when using exact match and phrase match – however previously you could opt out of it. Going forward, this is no longer the case. Here’s everything you need to know about this keyword match type shake-up.
At WordStream, we estimate that the change is a non-issue for approximately 97% of Google AdWords advertisers that didn’t opt out of close variant keyword match type option and who didn’t employ keyword “match type trap” optimization strategies.
However the 3% who were using exact and phrase match the old fashioned way will most certainly be impacted by the change. And for the record, we see no reason for why they had to remove an optional feature.
The use of classic phrase and exact match offered greater precision and control over exactly which search queries triggered your ads. At WordStream we’ve found that shaping PPC traffic using these more precise match types almost always improved ROI, typically in the range of low double digits.
Yes. The increased control and ROI came at a cost of dramatically increased account management complexity.
For example, an account with 10 million keywords would typically have consisted of around 1 million core keywords and 9 million variations of those same keywords. This resulted in many times more account artifacts which in turn created account inertia that made it harder be agile in other ways. For example, ad copy and landing page optimization was much harder because there were so many more ad groups to deal with, etc.
This was unfortunate because ad copy and landing page optimization activities provide far greater potential upside. For example, the top 10% of landing pages convert 3-5x higher  than the median landing page, and the top 1% of ad text generates 6x more clicks .
I have no idea. This isn’t the first time Google has deprecated functionality, for example, last year they retired  Device Targeting. In both cases though, Google retired targeting features that if used, resulted in substantially more complex account structure.
Beyond that, the concept of exact match is around 15 years old. Today we’re moving towards a “keywordless” future of search where organic search algorithms  like Hummingbird will show you search results for content that doesn’t even include the keywords you searched on, and Google Shopping ads don’t use  any keywords at all to target ads. As a result, I’d expect to see more of this “match type consolidation” in the near future.
Ultimately it’s a Google AdWords world. We’re just living in it.
Reduced account complexity by means of fewer keywordsExpanded reach by being able to capture more long tail keyword searches that would have otherwise been impossible to target due to “low search volume”. It was impossible to come up with all possible keyword variations for a niche.
Are There Any Benefits Of Forcing The Use Of Close Variant Keyword Matching?
No. Except that perhaps it forces search marketers to think more about more SEM strategy and more leveraged optimization activities like Conversion  Rate Optimization and Ad Copy  Optimization rather than mindless (and endless) keyword expansion.
What are your thoughts about the change in phrase and exact match?
Republished by permission. Original here .
Images: Google Support
Article printed from Small Business Trends: http://smallbiztrends.com
URL to article: http://smallbiztrends.com/2014/08/phrase-exact-keyword-match-adwords.html
URLs in this post:
 effectively killed off: http://adwords.blogspot.com/2014/08/close-variant-matching-for-all-exact.html
 close variant keyword matching: https://support.google.com/adwords/answer/2497836
 introduced: http://adwords.blogspot.com/2012/04/new-matching-behavior-for-phrase-and.html
 convert 3-5x higher: http://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2014/03/17/what-is-a-good-conversion-rate
 generates 6x more clicks: http://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2014/02/11/average-click-through-rate
 they retired: http://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2013/02/06/google-adwords-enhanced-campaigns
 algorithms: http://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2014/06/23/google-hummingbird
 don’t use: http://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2014/04/14/google-shopping-ads
 Original here: http://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2014/08/15/rip-exact-match