Two weeks ago, while talking with a friend who has a venture-backed business that is having trouble getting another round of funding, he jokingly suggested "maybe the government will bail out the VCs." Little did I know that others are apparently thinking this way -- and that we'd start seeing trial balloons floated for bailing out venture capitalists.\u00a0 In yesterday's New York Times, Thomas Friedman suggests giving $20 Billion to venture capitalists.\u00a0 Bailing out venture capitalists is a dumb idea. That's all we need -- our hard-earned money as small business owners and taxpayers going to subsidize the investment returns of venture capitalists.\u00a0 Because in the end, we have to remember that VCs are in it for an investment return. Fortunately, one of the smartest VCs around, Fred Wilson, says "No thanks" to public money.\u00a0 Basically, what he says is that only losers will want public money: "So Tom's idea, while it looks good on paper, is a dream. The top venture firms don't want, don't need, and are never going to take government money. The same is true of the top entrepreneurs. The worst firms, on the other hand, will gladly accept government money. And that is what is going to happen with all of these government efforts to pour more money into the "innovation sector". That money will go to bad investors and weak entrepreneurs and management teams for the most part. It's a problem of adverse selection. "\u00a0 But Rex Hammock makes the best point, by offering: " ... a note of reality to the perception that "investing in innovation" is what venture capitalists do. They're in the business of generating a high rate of return on money they invest. *** But I'm not writing here to blast VCs, but to correct the notion that companies backed by VCs are the ones that create jobs and grow the economy and solve society's problems. *** Here's the reality: The job creation, innovation and economic engine of America are not the companies that are funded by the top 20 venture funds, but the 99.999% of businesses who are run by people who could never get inside the door of one of the top 20 venture firms until long after they didn't need money from them." Rex couldn't have said it better. Don't subsidize VCs. I'd go a step further: let's stop bailing industries out. Period. And let's definitely not confuse venture-backed companies with America's unsung heroes: the small businesses owners who: don't get venture capital, but figure out on their own how to fund their businesses by getting customers; live on tight budgets while they plow their hard-earned money back into their businesses; sometimes pay their employees more than they pay themselves while they grow their businesses and create the economic foundation that this country is built on. Look,\u00a0venture capitalists\u00a0play a valuable role. But venture capitalists are simply irrelevant when it comes to the vast majority of small businesses and the economic engine they create. And we definitely shouldn't be subsidizing VCs' high investment returns with taxpayer money, especially not my taxes as a small business owner.