Venture capital (VC) companies have performed poorly in recent years, according to Cambridge Associates’ recently released statistics. Analysis by the consulting firm revealed that rates of return have dwindled substantially from the double-digit annual numbers they enjoyed in the 1990s. As of June 30, 2010, five-year returns to limited partners (LP) were merely 4.27 percent; 10-year returns were negative 4.15 percent.
Because most venture capitalists are wealthy, you shouldn’t worry that poor financial returns are imposing true hardship on them. But you should be concerned that their poor earnings are harming the ecosystem for developing high growth startup companies in the United States.
The Fundraising Side
Venture capitalists’ money doesn’t generally come from the VCs themselves, but from LPs who invest with the goal of earning greater returns than alternative investments provide. Because returns from venture capital investments have lagged returns from other classes of investments in recent years, LPs have been reallocating their money away from venture capital. As a result, VCs aren’t able to raise as much money as they used to.
The National Venture Capital Association (NVCA) reported that last year the fewest venture capital funds brought in new money since 1993, and that the industry raised only $15.4 billion in 2009, the smallest amount in real dollar terms since 2003. As a result of declining fund raising, last year the venture capital industry had $179 billion in capital under management, the least in real dollar terms since 1999.
Because returns to venture capital investments have been low, many of those working in the industry have decided to exit. The NVCA reports that in 2009 the number of venture capital funds declined to 1188, the lowest number since 1999, and down 37 percent from the peak in 2001. From 2007 to 2009 alone, the number of principals at venture capital firms shrank 23.2 percent.
The Investment Side
The decline in fund raising pushes down the number of investments venture capitalists make. Although the data through the first three quarters of 2010 suggest an uptick in activity this year, the NVCA reported that venture capitalists invested only $18 billion in start-ups in 2009, the smallest amount in real terms since 1996. Similarly, the NVCA found that venture capitalists made 2,802 deals in 2009, also the lowest number since 1996.
Fewer brand new companies are getting venture capital. The 728 companies that the NVCA reported received financing for the first time in 2009 were the lowest since 1994.
Similarly weak numbers are seen in follow-on funding. The 1,721 companies that the NVCA reports received follow-on financing in 2009 were the lowest since 1997.
As a result of the weak initial and follow-on funding, NVCA data show that the total number of companies receiving financing (2,372) last year and the real dollar value of the investments ($17.7 billion) were the lowest they’ve been since 1996.
Clearly, the venture capital industry is shrinking, at least in part because of its poor financial performance in recent years. Because venture capitalists invest in start-ups, the declining venture capital industry means that fewer entrepreneurs with high potential businesses are getting money from these investors.
That’s a problem because venture capital-backed start-ups are disproportionately likely to be job- and wealth-creating companies. Research shows that venture capital backed companies are about 150 times as likely as the average start-up to create jobs.
It’s unlikely that some other source of capital will replace the missing VC money. Angels are not a good candidate because their investments are very small compared to those made by VCs. Individual angels rarely invest more than $100,000 in a start-up and, as I have written elsewhere, the average investment by an angel group is less than $250,000. These numbers are far below the $6.3 million invested in the average venture capital deal in 2009 PricewaterhouseCoopers Money Tree data.
Moreover, as I pointed out in an earlier column, angel groups are also cutting back on the number of companies they finance.
Banks and other debt providers aren’t a substitute either. They will run afoul of usury laws if they charge the interest rates necessary to generate the rate of return expected for investments in the risky young companies that venture capitalists put their money in.
Unless the types of high growth entrepreneurs who got venture capital financing in a previous era, but won’t in today’s market, figure out a way to grow fast without venture capital, the shrinking venture capital industry is a problem for the future of high growth entrepreneurship in the United States.
Editor’s Note: This article was previously published at OPENForum.com under the title: “Venture Capitalists Failure to Make Money is a Problem for Entrepreneurs.” It is republished here with permission.
Sounds like it could be a slow recovery for VC as well. They won’t put more money in until the return rate improves, but improving the return rate is difficult without more money. Tough situation.
The world’s smallest violins are playing for these fools. VCs are not good investors, nor are they entrepreneurs. They were lionized, just like the hedge funds were, when they could invest & flip with no real thought. Now that they actually have to make smart investments they are clueless. This does not hurt entrepreneurs, other than the ones that just started crap companies that got funded based on who they were, rather than the importance of the idea. There has been, and will continue to be, plenty of money for good ideas.