Where your business is based can impact on how green you are. That’s the takeaway of a recent top 10 ranking of states by Site Selection magazine that ranked U.S. states on how well they engage in environmentally sustainable practices.
The rankings look at attributes such green industry projects, the number of projects certified by Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), financial incentives offered to support green projects, per capita renewable energy generation, funding for brownfields redevelopment and use of alternative-fuel vehicles.
Topping the list, unsurprisingly, is California, followed by Washington, Oregon, Minnesota and Colorado. The rankings also rate metro areas, with San Francisco; Portland, Ore.; Los Angeles; Chicago; and New York City as the top five. Interestingly, the United States doesn’t make it onto the magazine’s list of top sustainable countries; Canada is No. 1.
Though it may seem pointless to follow such rankings – especially since most businesses can’t just pick up and move – the Site Selection rankings do highlight the importance of building green communities and offering incentives to help businesses become environmentally friendlier. One part of the rankings is based on state and local financial incentives listed in the Database of State Incentives for Renewables & Efficiency, which is compiled by the North Carolina Solar Center and the Interstate Renewable Energy Council. This is a great resource for finding out what your state actually has to offer.
Knowing your state’s ranking can help you get a feel for whether it’s worth your time and effort to seek business incentives for energy-efficient activities, such as retrofitting lighting or installing solar panels. Such incentives can tip the financial balance and make it actually worth it for a small business to make such upgrades.
The article also touches on a greater debate as to how much green incentives and green focus play into economic growth. Are the states that engage businesses on environmental sustainability weathering today’s economic troubles better than ones that don’t ?
“Top-ranking areas for sustainability don’t just pass restrictive laws or put token solar panels on every edifice,” the article notes. “They nurture an ecosystem of business, institutions, government and individual citizens all striving to place a proper value on their locality’s limited resources, and sometimes to make or save money in the process.”
California Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsome claims that the state’s energy efficiency policies have produced 1.5 million jobs and $45 billion in payroll over the last 35 years.
I’m starting to see lots of green-related news in my home state of Ohio. There are even some wind-power turbines starting to pop up.
There’s even talk of building wind farms right on Lake Erie. Lots of things to think about, but more to actually do.
The sun and the wind are our future. I just hope that more people realize it.
The Franchise King®
I’d love to see some information on whether or not, ‘the states that engage businesses on environmental sustainability [are] weathering today’s economic troubles better than ones that don’t.’
Have you heard of any reports like this?
For all the praise heaped on the Bay Area, I believe that some of their restrictions are intrusive (such as the ban on incandescent light bulbs) and overstep the powers of government. I’m all for profitable “green” initiatives but even good things taken to extremes can be bad.
Too bad the U.S. doesn’t make the world’s top 10 list. We could all do a little (er, a lot) better. Great article!