U.S. Senator Jim Risch Wants More Money For SCORE

U.S. Sen. Jim Risch

U.S. Sen. Jim Risch (R-Idaho) has proposed boosting the coffers of the SCORE Program run by the Small Business Administration. To offset the proposed increase in revenue that would go to SCORE, Risch proposes dropping the Program for Investment in Micro-Entrepreneurs (PRIME), also run by the SBA. In a statement announcing his proposal, Risch said:

“While I have certainly found areas for reform and repeal, such as the PRIME program, I have also been impressed by SCORE and the impact they make with very little taxpayer support. I believe that with a modest increase in their funding, they can serve thousands more entrepreneurs.”

SCORE is a non-profit organization that’s designed to offer free mentoring and other advice to small business owners. SCORE has been operating for 50 years. The organization has at least 11,000 people working for it covering more than 60 industries, according to SCORE’s website.

The bill to increase SCORE’s funding was just introduced to the Senate earlier this month. Senators have yet to take action on the measure. If it’s passed, SCORE funding would be increased to $10.5 million by 2015.

In 2012, SCORE says its volunteers donated more than 1.1 million hours and advised on the start up more than 37,000 businesses. SCORE offers small business owners the ability to chat one-on-one with industry leaders working through the organization. There are also SCORE-sponsored webinars and seminars for small business owners and entrepreneurs.

SCORE CEO W. Kenneth Yancey applauded Risch’s new proposal, adding:

“It will specifically help as we expand our reach in rural communities and under-served areas. As an entrepreneur and small business advocate, Sen. Risch understands the importance of the support provided by SCORE and we are grateful for his leadership.”

The program being phased out to supply SCORE with additional funding is PRIME.

PRIME is like SCORE in that it’s a program designed to provide help to small business owners, particularly in rural areas. The program awards grants to organizations that work locally with small businesses, according to the PRIME website.

Even supporters of the program admit it was too underfunded and underutilized.

Image: Risch.Senate.gov


Joshua Sophy Joshua Sophy is the Editor for Small Business Trends and the Head of Content Partnerships. A journalist with 20 years of experience in traditional and online media, he is a member of the Society of Professional Journalists. He founded his own local newspaper, the Pottsville Free Press, covering his hometown.

4 Reactions
  1. A great proposal for a great program. I’ve learned many invaluable lessons from the former high-level managers and executives that coached me over the phone and email. It’s been an invaluable resource for my business (as my about page will support).

    I suspect that for every dollar put into the score program, five dollars or more will come out in the form of various entrepreneurial benefits to society.

  2. Uncertain as to where the money goes–the folks providing hard core advice at SCORE are not paid. They are made up mostly of people who have had a business in the past and many are retired but still feel a need to “give back.” My guess the funding is for the support staff, which means overhead and general & admin costs.

    They may be OK for people who need to be pointed in the right direction and very general advice; however, if you need advice for an advanced technology start-up they usually cannot help (by their own admission). SCORE must serve everyone in all business sectors, so look elsewhere for tech start-up help.

  3. But putting down PRIME for SCORE is not a good thing. While knowledge is generally important, it can also get crippling. I think investing is better. But that’s just me.

  4. I am glad to see that SCORE might be getting additional financial support. It’s a proven program.

    I don’t know much about PRIME, but then perhaps that says something right there.

    Anyway, it’s good to see one program getting support without necessarily increasing the overall burden on the taxpayer (at least, that’s what I hope will happen).