Photographer Driven Bananas Over Wikipedia Monkey Selfies

wikipedia monkey selfies

In an interesting case of man vs. animal vs. copyright law, Wikipedia has refused repeated requests from a photographer to remove a famous series of monkey self-portraits because the animal pressed the button, which they believe puts the image into the public domain.

David Slater is a British nature photographer who was attempting to get the perfect shot of a crested black macaque while traveling through Indonesia in 2011. Eventually one of the rather jubilant monkeys decided to hijack the photographer’s equipment to work on her photography skills. The monkey ended up taking hundreds of grinning self-portraits – which of course went viral on the Internet soon after.

Slater said about the experience at the time to the Telegraph:

“They were quite mischievous jumping all over my equipment, and it looked like they were already posing for the camera when one hit the button. The sound got his attention and he kept pressing it. At first it scared the rest of them away but they soon came back – it was amazing to watch. He must have taken hundreds of pictures by the time I got my camera back, but not very many were in focus. He obviously hadn’t worked that out yet.”

Wikipedia then posted the images to its site claiming that since the monkey actually took the shot, she should own copyright and not Slater, thus putting the pictures into the public domain. The images were taken down several times due to Slater’s complaints, but ultimately Wikipedia editors have decided to keep them posted.

Slater said about the ordeal:

“If the monkey took it, it owns copyright, not me, that’s their basic argument. What they don’t realise is that it needs a court to decide that. Some of their editors think it should be put back up. I’ve told them it’s not public domain, they’ve got no right to say that its public domain. A monkey pressed the button, but I did all the setting up.”

Now Wikipedia could be facing a legal battle to keep these hilarious pictures posted. U.S. copyright law can be a grey area and while using the photos for editorial purposes would definitely fall under “fair use,” according to the law, putting the image into the public domain (and making it available for free use) without the photographer’s consent is a whole different story.

Who do you think should own copyright to the best selfie ever taken: The photographer, the monkey or the public?

Images: Wikipedia

More in: 5 Comments ▼

DashBurst DashBurst is part of the Small Business Trends Publisher Channel and is an open content network for creators, marketers, designers, bloggers, small businesses and brands and covers the latest in social media, marketing, technology and design. The site also features fresh infographics, presentations, videos, photos and more. It is a highly-frequented independent publication online that focus on social media and Web culture.

5 Reactions
  1. It’s funny how a legal battle has to happen for the right to put up these pictures. I am certainly not loving looking at it so it is better to be removed. But that is just my personal opinion.

  2. The creator of the photo is the monkey. Authors own the copyright in the work they create. Monkeys cannot be authors. Monkeys cannot assign the work to the owner of the equipment because they do not own it in the first place. And I would say that the monkey would not understand the ramifications of the assignment as a contractual matter in any event.

    The photos are in the public domain.

    Wikipedia is correct as far as American copyright law goes.

  3. Wikipedia comes across exactly like Walter in The Big Lebowski:

    “Am I wrong?”
    “No you’re not wrong.”
    “Am I wrong?”
    “You’re not wrong Walter. You’re just an asshole.”

  4. @Steven Been laughing all morning.

    “If the law supposes that,” said Mr. Bumble,… “the law is a ass—a idiot. If that’s the eye of the law, the law is a bachelor; and the worst I wish the law is that his eye may be opened by experience—by experience.”

    Charles Dickens, Oliver Twist

    Same point, different century.

  5. That’s the best selfie I’ve ever seen. lol

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *