About Us   |   Advertise

The Y2K Bug and Running a Big Business Like a Small One

running a big business

The world was coming to an end at midnight 31 December 1999. We had planned for it for years. It was, as one techno-wag said, “a disaster with a deadline.”

The Year 2000 rollover was going to be big. Worldwide. No escape. Like Noah and the flood, we knew it was coming. We knew this would be no mere technology challenge to be solved with exceptional American ingenuity. The Year 2000 was problematic with unknown unknowns.

The predictions were dire: The Internet would go down. Cell phones dead. The power grid dark — Armageddon.

In the late 1990s, one-half of the world’s Internet traffic passed through the Commonwealth of Virginia, thanks to America Online — AOL.com. And maybe another Northern Virginia entity in Arlington: the Pentagon.

(I think that was a secret … )

Your business professor had the Y2K responsibility for Health and Human Resources, a $5 billion enterprise in the Virginia government. The boss, Governor Jim Gilmore, a former military intelligence officer, knew what was possible — and not — to combat the Y2K Bug.

There was a lot we couldn’t do. And it wasn’t all technology.

It was a condition of continued employment that there was to be no interruption or adverse incidents to the citizens of the Commonwealth and the rest of the world.

(We worker bees could not get it wrong. The world ends AND get a bad employee appraisal. A sub-par job performance would not be the simple career-ending, world-ending mistake. It would be going out with a bang, so to say.)

Business literature notes the adrenaline rush of the “peak experience.” The Office of the Governor of Virginia had this motivation as he had the whole world in his hands.

The Web had to run for the wide world and more: Virginia’s hospital doors had to remain open; the prison doors closed. Fresh water and waste water valves had to direct flow in the correct and desired directions.

Local first responders had to be able to coordinate communications across jurisdictional silos. Governor Gilmore was among the first to realize the importance of seamless radio traffic between Fed/State/Local law enforcement. (It still wouldn’t be fixed years later, as in 9/11 or more recently.)

There were lots of challenges beyond government resources. So, Gilmore hired the biggest IT consulting firms on the planet and bought their solution packages. In my weekly staff meetings I had a dozen of the smartest experts in the business. I was not one of them.

They let me think I was in control at the head of the table. And maybe so. But these consultants wouldn’t let me, a mere bureaucrat, make a mistake. I didn’t know how to run a very large organization.

Actually, no one really does, but the Governor gave me this advice:
B.lioy”Pick a small team and run them as a small business. It will be the same except with more zeros.” I didn’t know if he was talking about the budget or about me. Could go either way.

There were some mistakes the professional tech-gurus could not save me from — I had to learn on my own. I wasted time deep in the weeds doing real work. Instead of managing managers, I wanted to roll-up my sleeves and pound keyboards. I called it, ‘attention-to-detail.’ The staff called it ‘micromanaging.’

Like most small business owners, I had trouble delegating tasks. But I had to adjust fast; I ran out of time. There was an unstoppable countdown and I had to trust the work to the professionals.

Virginia spent $215 million and nothing happened here or in the rest of the world. There were some problems in Nigeria. We now think it was some kind of scam.

Nothing crashed. Except for that super-secret three-letter-agency satellite … and some defibrillators. Not my fault. No one died.

The lesson learned was that the technology was the easy part. The real challenge was in delegation and managing projects — through people — on time and on budget.

It always is.

The Pentagon Photo via Shutterstock


Jack Yoest John Wesley (Jack) Yoest Jr., is a Clinical Assistant Professor of Management at The Catholic University of America. His expertise is in management training and development, operations, sales, and marketing. Professor Yoest is the president of Management Training of DC, LLC. A former Captain in the U.S. Army and with various stints as a corporate executive, he also served as Assistant Secretary for Health and Human Resources in the Administration of Governor James Gilmore of Virginia.

102 Reactions
  1. I could still remember my nanny telling me (for I was a kid back then) that it will be the end of the world. But then it didn’t happen.

  2. Aira, yes–and it wasn’t just your nanny who feared the end of the world. It was a media story as you can imagine (if it bleeds, it ledes). But we just didn’t know.

    So we did a variation of Pascal’s Wager: If we were wrong, everyone got a new laptop and updated software; if we were wrong the power grid goes down and the forces of darkness would be upon us.

    Good upside and we avoided a tragedy.

    You are right: The world didn’t end.


  3. Aira, oops — I got mixed up on right and wrong (happens a bit…).

    Your Business Professor,

  4. Jack,

    Have you read Dr. Eli. Gold’s book, Critical Chain? He describes the theory of constraints in a colorful way.

  5. Very interesting between the attention to detail and micro managing. In this type of situation there was a lot of speculation which made the future unclear which makes the job that much harder for the manager to decide what needs his/her attention. But being able to delegate and listen to others, especially in this situation when the experts were the ones reporting to you, is a huge management tool. It is a good thing to be prepared however and this is what the spending of 215 million did for Virginia. Some might say that it wasn’t worth it but it sounds like the correct steps were taken to avoid tragedy.

  6. Confidence is contagious, it seems like your boss told you to run the large entity like a small one because potentially it was what you have had experience with? (Correct me if I’m wrong) Or maybe that the fact that the obstacle seemed so large that it almost seemed insurmountable. But by taking a step back and focusing on one sector you were able to overcome your own reservations. By doing so you enabled others to have confidence in their work, and believe that this was not an impending Armageddon, but simply the start of a new age. No matter what the case may be when put in a leadership position, even if you don’t have a plan, you need to have a plan, like General Grant leaders always need to have that ‘4 o’clock in the morning courage’. That ideal is exactly what you exemplified.
    – Bravo

  7. Martin, No, I have not yet read “Critical Chain” — I have ordered it and will add it to Gold’s “It’s Not Luck” and “The Goal.”

    Well, actually, I got the Audible, but you get my drift…

    If it is anywhere near as good as his other books it will be a welcome edition, so to say.

    Thanks for the recommendation,

  8. Luke, excellent observation on the management dilemma: How much to delegate to staff when the stakes and risks are so high.

    The manager, in this case, Your Business Professor was nervous: I didn’t know what I was doing and there was ambiguity in every unknown. I was, in a word, Lost.

    Just like most amateur managers…

    Everything did work out, but all I remember is the uncertainly.


  9. Elias, thank you for your kind words. But I think the solution was found more in exhaustion than in courage.

    The management team was forced to get recommendations from the expert staff and then get the resources. Because we had limited time and had no option but to trust the team. There were laptops buried (like skeletons) in every closet in the Commonwealth. Every piece of hardware and software had to be found.

    My life would have been a bit easier if I had more practice in the practice of management.


  10. Gabriella Cornacchio

    Initially, I was hesitant to read this article, as I found it hard to believe that one could run a large business similarly to a small one. It seemed preposterous. Yet, in this article, “The Y2K Bug and Running a Big Business Like a Small One,” Jack Yoest has a point. The reason small businesses are so reliable is because everyone has a job and every one (typically) does their job right. The trick to running a large business is to take the work ethic of a small business. By spending more time delegating tasks and focusing on the minor details, the outcome is substantially better. This is the tactic people in charge of big businesses need to take if they want results. I really enjoyed this article because it shows that one must put in the effort to reap the rewards. In this new day and age where generation y is ruled by technology, but we still have the power to use it for our own benefits. The point, however, is not to let it overtake us. Instead, we must keep our heads straight and use it as an aid, without putting our sole reliance on it. Rather, we must still manage business through hard work ethics and delegating jobs.

  11. Gabriella, managing any business is hard work but it can be learned. Delegation for the small business owner and the new manager seem to be the most challenging skill to be developed.

    Peter Thiel who guided multiple breakthrough companies, including PayPal wrote his book, “Zero To One: Notes on Startups.” He gives terrific advice, including–to give one thing to one person — to hold one individual responsible for an individual task or project. Everyone in his company knows, “You have one job.”

    Thank you for your comment,

  12. Jack:
    I agree with your premise on the small business approach. After all these years, it seems to me that the approach for a good manager is the same. if a small business, then take an active hand, organize well what you do, assess costs, and enforce quality to grow the business. In a larger enterprise, the same is true, but the ‘owner’ needs to delegate more to those that share both his trust and enthusiasm for quality, and then let them run with the ball (with oversight, of course).

    We have too many managers who simply want to look at the past and assume they are doing well, without realizing that things have changed. i recently worked with a small firm– a restaurant–whose only ‘planning’ was to see what they did on a particular day the year before to reassure themselves they were doing well. of course, they had no real idea of their costs-fixed or variable, in terms of what they offered, had a huge menu requiring large inventories, and no planning for the future. The owners took a limited part in the restaurant, mostly back-bench quarterbacking, and left the work to managers who rolled from day-t-day. They were gradually losing customers over time, and profits, and didn’t even realize it.

    They still run the business the same way–they refused to accept or adapt to change, and they are still losing volume. Hiring qualified management could save this situation with some organized hard work.

    BTW, one of the interesting parts of Y2K, at least at DoD, was to find that the Department had over 42,000 applications and systems subject to the Y2K rules. With few exceptions (Mostly Command and Control) it was “wait to see what happens”. Thankfully, not much did, and we moved forward.


  13. John, an outstanding observation on the “control” part of management–and this often requires an outside expert (you) to evaluate the small business performance.

    The ‘planning’ part of management is to decide the direction the business will take. The ‘control’ part of management is to compare the results to the plan. It sounds like your client was attempting to do this by comparing same day sales this year compared to last.

    But as you note, this is often not enough–and the real measure is that your client was losing customers. I would submit that the business could have retained these disaffected customer and increased profits if the small business owner took your counsel.

    Good comment,

  14. Cristina Del Rio

    Professor, very interesting article and what a great advise. I believe stress is a huge understatement for what you, the team, and the world was going through that year. Having to manage a big company in this moment in time must have felt incredibly overwhelming, and when we are overwhelmed we can loose track of what the big picture is. The advise you got from your boss was great: think of it as a small business and get a small team. Before that, you and the team were looking at a blurry picture, full of insecurities due to the inexperience in technology and the uncertainty of what exactly was going to happen! And the fact that it was a big company made it a whole lot messier. However, when you think of it as a small business, you have a clearer vision of what you are facing – which at the end was not technology but how to manage the situation. Managing in general, assigning tasks and responsibility to others, delegating for your team and trusting them is the hard part, and as you mentioned, it is always the hard part no matter the situation or size of the business. I saw this everyday at my internship with my team. We always need to focus of the bigger picture and prevent ourselves from confusing what our main objective is – in your case, it was to manage the change that we were all about to face. Great job, and thank you for passing over the advice!

  15. Cristina, you are right: management is getting things done — but each of the decisions is usually less well defined — there are often no clear answers.

    Ambiguity and incomplete data and conflicting interests each drive the management process.

    And that’s why Peter Drucker calls management a “practice” because the boss better be always learning.

    Well Done,

  16. This article was very interesting because the way to handle this task was very well thought out. It is always hard to handle anything that new and might seem like it depends on just you. I think that the mindset to think it was being handled as a small business was very tactical. Although it was very different just starting with a specific mindset helped not freak out with all the pressure. This also shows the importance of team work. As everyone made sure everything came out just right made everything be a success.

    I agree with Gabriella because technology is a great resource to have but we have to know how to use it wisely. In this case, what seemed to be the most hard to handle was the easiest. If technology is used in the way that it should, it will give the results needed, but people have to have control not the other way around. This article was very informative and worth reading.

    • Hally, you are right: The manager and business owner are responsible for all the unit does or fails to do — but the boss and owner should never be alone — most decisions should come from recommendations developed from research from the staff.

      Well Done,

    • Hally, you make a good point. Teamwork is extremely important in any situation. In the professor’s situation, the team needed to put aside their insecurities and find a solution. They had immense pressure (I mean, who wouldn’t?), but they all tried their best to persevere.

  17. I have no idea what it was like to be aware of such a terrible event. Being told that the world will end is not something I’d like to hear. I can’t imagine what it must have been like to manage a company during those terrible moments. I could see how uncertain you and your team were during that time. When your boss told you to “think of it as small business” I could see how truly effective that could be. If you look at it as small business, you could understand how to manage the situation. You had to get things done no matter how big or small the situation was. In your situation, it was a pretty big one. I learned that we must focus and use our knowledge so we can manage any situation. We must never lose sight of our goal, no matter how impossible it may seem.

    • Raymond, I agree with your last point very much. No matter how tough our job gets, as manager the job is clear to lead the team and always have your goal in sight and when the time for promotion comes you have to trust the professionals to do their job. Especially in moments like this when the future is unclear. The biggest motivator for the company is to achieve that goal. We have to be clear of what we aim for always.

    • I agree with you. It would be terrible to be aware of such terrible event. And also it must have been very difficult for a manager to keep doing his work in those difficult times.

    • Raymond, you are right — uncertainty is always a challenge for managers in most any situation or level in an organization.


  18. Its incredible how you managed to keep going in a moment like this. When you didn’t know what would turn out to be the future because the world was said to end. You were a small business owner who is used to do the work yourself and you didn’t know how to run a large operation. They put you in charge of various professionals and you had to trust them to do the work while you were the manager and delegated the tasks. It seems hard to imagine to be put in a position like that where you had to learn yourself how to pull through with just a little advice form the governor, which is insufficient to what the position you were put in especially with the deadline approaching with practically a small amount of time to learn. I guess this is just part of taking part in a new position of management.

  19. In the time of the events of this article you can notice how people freaked out because they thought the world would end. They got carried away with the idea that the world was going to end in the 2000s and did everything according to that “due date”. Also, being a management of an important company may be very complicated according to the circumstances. The manager had to do something for this “due date” and it was hard for him to gather all the people to collaborate in a short amount of time.

    • Melissa, true, the concern, indeed the near-terror of many technologists during the Year 2000 roll-over was driven by the uncertainty of every computer going from (19)99 to (20)00. There were too many unknown unknowns.

      The best that the managers could do was to reduce the risk.

      Well Said,

  20. Nikolai Senchenko

    It sounds like a huge change going from managing a small business to a large one. It’s interesting how the difficulty comes in looking at the bigger picture at letting go of the minor details. That is why it’s really important to trust your team that you’re managing in a large business like you would your partners and employees in your own small business. If the same level of trust is there, then you are more able to focus on larger aspects of the business instead of the minor details that small business owner’s face. Also, it must have been a very stressful time to run a business during the frenzy that the end of the world belief created. During that time, all you could do is put trust team, delegate the tasks that needed to be done, and hope for the best.

  21. Managing a team through a “crisis situation” has to be the utmost test out there for any type of leader or manager. I’m almost envious of the opportunity, but would also be terrified of the failure that could have been at hand. A lot of what I am seeing from successful managers is how important clear and direct communication can be and the better communicator you are, the better leader you are and the more your peers respect you.

  22. I have found that the most effective managers are those that are able to delegate not in high-pressure situations, but in situations leading up to the high-pressure situations. If a manager can effectively communicate with their team on a day-to-day basis, formulating relationships and creating work environment norms, it will be easy for a team to operate effectively with one another when they find themselves in time sensitive situations because they are aware of the strengths and weaknesses of their peers. Managers will be able to effectively delegate tasks if they are familiar with their team and their abilities. Additionally, it is easier to deal with conflict, which typically arises in sensitive situations, if peers and managers alike have relationships outside of dictating tasks.

  23. Times of trouble seem to bring out the best and worst in people, but it truly tests the manager/leader and his capability to manage and lead. The possibility of the world ending is certainly a time that would call for a lot of stress and uncertainty for the manager, as it did for you. As mentioned in the article, “”there was an unstoppable countdown and [you] had to trust the work to the professionals.” For someone who does not believe or trust in the capability of his staff, this situation would have been even more of a disaster than the world ending. However, the good manager/leader should surround himself with a great team of people that he can always trust and depend on, regardless of the situation they are in. This way, the team can work together to achieve a common goal, despite the craziness that surrounds them.

  24. Managing a team through a crisis is one of the hardest things you have to do as a manager. Anyone can be a successful manager if everything goes smooth. However the fact is that no business is every going to be perfect. As a good manager, you should be able to keep calm in critical situations so that you can make the right decision. If you do not think about your decision and get nervous, that is when you are going to make a bad decision.

  25. Professor Yoest,
    First of all I want to say that I loved this piece. Shared the link to some managers whom I feel could benefit from it!
    My questions for you are:
    How do you stop yourself from micromanaging?
    Is there really a way to instill absolute trust in your team?
    and if you get to the point where you can put perfection and attention to detail aside, how do you recover if your team lets you down?

  26. When faced with something thought to bring about Armageddon, the best thing you can do is remain calm. I think it is admirable when someone like Governor Gilmore knows what he can and can’t do. It shows that they have been thinking about a problem, both its solutions and its consequences. It takes a good leader to realize the things that are futile so he can focus on the things he still has time to work on. The best thing he can do is delegate because no one can finish all of the important tasks themselves and have time to spare.

  27. So many times we over look things, and it can cause massive panic and overreaction. I think 215 million dollars is somewhat of an overreaction. A lot of the times as a manager you need to be worried about every possible outcome or every possible failure but I think it is key to note you don’t need to spend all of your money on just simply ideas and not solutions.

  28. I found this article to be very interesting, first only that I had no idea that the state of Virginia was as essential as it was to the development of the internet. Additionally I believe that it was very important that the Governor did all that he could to prepare for what could have been an incredibly disastrous event, both economically and from a public safety concern. As has been often noted it is always necessary for leader to maintain control in stressful situations such as this. The necessity for the governor to call in numerous firms to prepare for this ‘impending doom’ reminds me of a Benjamin Franklin quote, “By failing to prepare, you are preparing to fail”, especially when tasked with the safety of numerous citizens I believe this was an incredibly wise decision by the governor.

  29. Successful small businesses are so successful because of their work ethic and because of their structure. By structure, I mean everyone has a role and knows exactly how to function in that role. So if this work ethic is so successful, and is usually one of the big factors in putting these businesses on the map and expanding them, why shouldn’t this work ethic carry over to large businesses? It’s not so easy to carry that kind of ethic over to such a large scale, but when it’s done correctly it can make that business wildly successful.

  30. It’s so important for managers to be able to recognize every possible cause and effect of different decisions, which is obviously not an easy thing to do. I think that the easiest way to do that starts with building a strong, trustworthy team as a manager.

  31. One of things we learned this semester in MGT 310 is that a true leader must be able to adapt. When you are in a time of crisis you must adapt and not do things the same way as you would have. It is impossible to predict the future and you must be prepared if things do not go as planned. True leaders thrive in times of crisis and under pressure.

  32. True leaders are able to succeed in times of crisis. We learned this semester in MGT 310 that leaders must be able to adapt, and times of crisis are the when a leader really must adapt. Times of crisis are impossible to predict but leaders should be able to anticipate and plan for anything. A person’s true nature is shown in times of pressure and it is how they react then that can really make the difference.

  33. Elizabeth Gittings

    When someone is good at something, and they know they can do it the right way their way every time, why would you delegate it? I think this is a mentality that many people have including myself. I have a hard time allowing other people to help me with my tasks when I like it done my way or the highway. This changed when I was once told that a good manager trusts the people they hire, and that you know a good manager when they don’t have to move a finger for their work to be done. A real manager manages people, not tasks, and makes sure that these people get the job done. This article portrays that, and the unnecessary stress that managers continuously put on themselves when they pay people to do the work for them.

  34. Sometimes we take advantage of what we have. If technology didn’t exist, I believe there would be many managers trying to figure out the best way to handle the situation. Managers would want to do it themselves because they want it done right, especially with something huge like technology. Managers have to be flexible and manage people and projects in a different way while still being on budget and on time. When not knowing when something bad is going to happen or wondering if something bad is going to happen puts the pressure on. If the manager does not have a plan for when disaster strikes, the whole company could go out of business. Every manager should have a plan for if/when technology is not there or fails us.

  35. Whether you are an intern or CEO of the company, delegation is one of the most difficult tasks to perform and carry out. As an intern for Fox Business Network, I struggle with retaining and performing the specific tasks delegated to me by my manager and other staff employees, just the same as the Chief of the D.C. Bureau is constantly running around the offices and sending out multiple emails trying to figure out who will take up what task. If delegation is done efficiently, a company can run so smoothly and things would get done much quicker. That is why planning in advance is so important and no time can be wasted when doing so.

  36. Throughout my college career I have worked with many leaders in student clubs and internships in D.C. Some of the time, the leaders were very good a delegating tasks and some of the time I felt completely micromanaged and that anything I would do could not be as good as what the managers or leaders could do. I have also been on the other side where I was the leader and would not give any meaningful tasks to my assistant because I thought they would just mess up the projects that I had been working so hard on. That would then end up just creating more work and more stress for me. So if I have learned anything from these experiences I would say that you have to find a good balance between micromanaging and trusting others with different tasks. You cannot do the project alone without spreading yourself to thin and you cannot delegate the whole project away because you do need to check in and make sure your employees understand what they are working on.

  37. Katarina Percopo

    “I called it, ‘attention-to-detail.’ The staff called it ‘micromanaging.”
    This statement really struck me. Most small businesses have a hard time trying to delegate and split up the tasks at hand to the right people that would get the job done. When trying to fix a problem the boss cannot take control and do it all oneself, they must have help from their employees. A boss is supposed to manage and make decisions, not trying to do every little task the business must complete. Another thing that caught my attention was that trust is one of the most important aspects of a business. A boss must be able to trust their employees to get tasks done in the manner in which they expect. The employees need to also have trust and faith in their employer as well.

  38. Stephen Terenzio

    One of the greatest entrepreneurs of all time, John D. Rockefeller, has also been described as one of the best delegators. It’s important for leaders to sort through work and tasks that they can do, and send the rest down the line to employees underneath them. One of the keys to successful delegation is having the right people to delegate to. If a leader can select a team that meets their expectations and standards, there’s a greater chance they will trust delegating work to other employees. The important part, however, is the team, if you cannot delegate work down to others because there is uncertainty about their ability to perform, leaders will often end up taking on too many tasks. When this happens everyone’s work quality and production can suffer.

  39. Delegating has always been a huge responsibility of management. Without delegation, there is a loss of order, which could ultimately result in unfinished products and tasks. It is through delegation that projects can be completed on time and efficiently. When managers set deadlines and tell employees the jobs that need to be completed by those deadlines,the tasks can be done on time and the stress involved in those situations can be lessened. Everyone knows the job that they have and this ultimately results and aids in their ability to know what they have to get done and they can get it done well. Employees can focus on the task the delegator gave to them and they don’t have to worry about anything else.

  40. As the head or manager of a company it is important to delegate. You have a set of employees who all have a different set of skills. As the manager, it is your job to put the employee in the best opportunity to succeed. This can be better explained by relating it to football. A football coach should put his player in positions to win one on one battles. For example, a coach will not put his slowest player at running back because they will not succeed in helping the team win. In the same way the managers should use its employees who can best perform a specific task.

  41. An idea that we discussed heavily in organizational behavior and leadership and organizations which I took with you last semester, a big idea that was communicated is that one of the major components of the employee/manager relationship is the employee should be taking work off the managers desk, not adding to it. This is not just on the employees, another concept we heavily discussed was surrounding yourself with people who influence success, not halter it. This relates back to the manager, the ability for the manager to surround himself with the right people is crucial for being able to delegate and lead in a fashion that ultimately leads to success for the organization.

  42. In business, I value the idea of running a big business like a small business more than anything. I grew up with the mindset of always wanting to be successful, especially in the field of business, but to the extent that is actually meaningful, and not where I would just blend into the crowd and not make a difference with my work. I always strive to leave an impact on whoever or whatever I may be doing, no matter how big or small the project may be. This concept to which I value so highly is present in the Y2k Bug article. Professor Yoest was given a task – a task he very much was not used to being given. Instead of blending in with the rest of the company and kind of just let someone else do the job, he took a stand and took that role of treating a big business like a small one. His desire to “roll-up his sleeves and pound keyboard” is very much something I can relate to, because I too am always looking to stretch that extra mile and go above and beyond what I asked of me. Treating this situation as a small business would is exactly the reason why the outcome came to be what it was. I believe if more people in the business world (especially those high up in levels) treated business as a small one, more effective outcomes would come to be.

  43. The article “The Y2K Bug and Running a Big Business Like a Small One” by Jack Yoest, demonstrates the importance of being able to adapt to different situations as a leader. He mentions a personal experience where he had to adapt to a (thought to be) critical situation. Professor Yoest had the Y2K responsibility for Health and Human resources in an enterprise of the Virginia government. He was in charge of managing a large group of IT experts hired to help diminish the interruptions and incidents the Y2K bug could cause on December 31, 1999. It was important for him to adapt to this situation since he wasn’t used to managing a large group of people. In this case, he had to transfer his power to the people who had the information in order for them to complete their tasks. From this experience, he learned that the problem of the Y2K bug wasn’t the possible technology crash but the importance of knowing how to delegate in a situation like this. It is important for managers to learn how to adapt to critical situations because even though they are not the person who is going to solve the problem directly, they are in charge of the people who will.

  44. Handling a team of individuals and creating a bond amongst those individuals is one the hardest adjustments to being a new manager. The next would be assigning roles to those team members and not trying to do everything oneself. It is like An offensive coordinator in football getting the head coaching job and still trying to run the offense he completely forgets about the defense and the team fails. Every great head coach knows that he must hire assistants that are not only capable of the job but also not afraid to take on responsibility. The coach or manager must hire the rite people and set those people up for success, but then it is those employees jobs to execute. Having a great team to rely on can create much less stress for the boss and in result lead to great success.

  45. For most of us, eventually, in our career lives, we will sooner or later be in charge of a group of people. The number of the group, however, will definitely vary, as we go higher on the hierarchy. In this article, was mentioned a great advice, especially for those of us who would be managers for the first time, on how to go about managing these big groups of people. As the advice mentioned “Pick a small team and run them as a small business. It will be the same except with more zeros.” Our schools and universities acknowledge the importance of working with teams, and sometimes, we end up being the leaders in these small teams for class projects. So, most of us, without maybe realizing it, we already have, or soon will be in a leadership position. The quoted advice comes to play after we have worked in a group project setting, as it calls back our previous experiences we had in these small groups, and reassures us that it is going to be similar to that experience, just on a bigger scale, with more members. Some might say that no, there is no comparison between class projects and the real managerial position. But none the less, it is the closest example to reassure a new manager of the way things would be.

  46. Brandon Johnston

    One of the biggest challenges for a new manager is to figure out what needs to be done to get the team working well together well and smoothly. In the article, the manager seemed to be overwhelmed by the amount of work and people that he had to manage, but was given the advice of “Pick a small team and run them as a business. It will be the same except with more zeros.” To me, this was important for two reasons. The first reason is that there are many cases growing up in different parts of our lives where we are put in the same situation, with the difference being that we aren’t managing a business. Whether this is through school, sports, or other extracurricular activities, there are always those who lead a small group, just like what was being asked of in the article. This familiarity makes tasks like this seem easier, as you have been in similar situations as before. The reason this is so important to me is because that this can be seen as a reassuring tactic to calm and get a new manager ready, as these situations are something that can be related to, just on a bigger scale. I am not saying that this will instantly make the task easier, but it takes away some of the stress and doubt that a new manager might have.

  47. No one can less agree with the fact that technology has eased our work everywhere, say it at home or in business but managing a projects or work is something for which you need the right skills and ‘know how’ kind of attitude. No matter how much we all praise that technology is bringing new developments in the corporate world, reducing the need for manpower and saving lots of financial resources for all organizations, delegating projects and getting things done through staff at workplace is completely a different kind of a story.

    Even though our dependence on technology has made projects and jobs more successful but ultimately at the end of the day, we still need people physically available those manage people who are working on various projects and using the ‘so called’ technology to get the projects finished. This cannot be done by only relying on technology, organizations around the world still need that human skill to make things happen on a timely schedule. Technology surely helps in making those projects easy to work on, but it doesn’t helps at all when finishing that project in a limited amount of time available to the team or a workforce at large.

  48. Natalie M Barbieri

    Technology is never the issue. It is always personnel. And, sometimes this personnel is US. I am definitely my own worst enemy. I like to blame technology for my discretions, but usually if I was better at my job, the incident would have never occurred. In teaching, I can usually get something done if I plan ahead. If I do not plan and something goes wrong with the technology, I am in an uproar, but I should have planned to complete the task previously. The same thing goes for my side business. Sometimes my packaging labels are wrong, and I get angry, but if I would have printed my labels previously, this would not have been an issue. I have yet to learn from my mistakes.

  49. This article shows us again how high is the importance of communication and right leadership. If it comes to any projects – having skilled, qualified team is not enough to solve the problems and manage the situation. Especially, when the project involved hundreds of people, you have to be able to delegate responsibilities because it is the only way to make all elements of the project work. I personally, always struggle with delegation of tasks. It is hard to have strong trust that your people will do as much as possible to make things work out. On the other hand, I have also learnt that if you put some trust, little by little, people appreciate that and are able to work harder to meet your expectations. What is more, the big part of delegation of responsibilities is the importance of the deputies in the completed staff work. Every manager or leader need someone to count on and trust. We all have to start from the right communication to build strong relations with people in the work environment as well as in the private life. We need to first be for our subordinates to expect them to be devoted to us.

  50. harshani kumarasinghe

    I think the leadership with the proper planning despite of what type of a technology or process you are planning will be a key matter n this subject.as mentioned the work delegation is the key role where you see the beauty of a desired leadership skilled while working with different personnel with different levels of skills but yet to directing them for a one task is hard to believe. treating your own team fairly and building confidence will make up the team spirit and the make their personalities stronger.the technology plays the huge role it could make things easier or the things complex it is all depends ho we use it and corporate in to our work, but still we love in a human world where our end customers would be humans at some point so we still need to build competence levels of our team rather than depending on technology.

  51. Considering today’s advanced technology looking back to Y2K problem seems ridiculous. However every milestone had its own impact in changing the pace of global innovations in technology and business. There are some tactics that can be applied in a small businnes that works for a big businnes either. Sometimes the tasks that seem daunting and immense can actually be dealt with following fundamental principles of relatively easy tasks. Yes, the scope and impact of the decisions can be vastly different but essential problem solving approaches resemble or even identical.

  52. Being able to run a small business may seem like a minuscule task to someone running a big business. This article does a great job of explaining how the ability to run an efficient small business is relevant to running a big business. Having such a great deal of responsibility can cause anyone a great deal of pressure but the way that pressure is handled can be the difference between life and death, as displayed in this article. The advice the Governor really stuck out to me, “Pick a small team and run them as a small business.” This advice I find very interesting because when running a big business many believe their work goes unnoticed or it does not directly contribute to the goal of the business. However, this is unlike a small business everyone has a role and knows their role is just as important as any other role. Those who work in small businesses recognize the importance of their work and the contributions they make. This article does a great job of displaying how this can be possible in a big business.

  53. James F. Turner IV

    Y2K is probably one of the biggest overreactions our society has ever faced. Many people panicked about Y2K and declared it as the end of the world as we know it. I found this article very enticing as it shows how a government and a consultant dealt with the “end of the world as we know it”. The main issue that Jack Yoest faced in this article was a deadline with a group of people that he must instruct. The state of Virginia had to be operational even with the doom of Y2K. The proper planning was essential in preparing for this crisis. The article talks about running this important project as if it was a small business. The idea itself is oxymoronic and a difficult idea to grasp. But, this is an interesting concept for a crisis as a small business takes a lot of delegating. A small business usually has a CEO that gives very precise instructions on how employees should be working. In other words, a CEO of a small business becomes a master delegator. Delegating is in fact a very important part of a crisis. A crisis needs to be handled by a strong leader who can handle giving out specific orders to a group of people. Delegation can solve a crisis because when a strong leader gives provides a division of labor, it then provides for a successful project. Treating a crisis, a small business is in fact how you handle a business.

  54. Martha Salazar Banda

    The Y2K story seems like taking out of a movie. What would younger generations think of it? Nowadays, every answer is on Google. The idea of the “end of the world” at least, technologically speaking seems unbearable for younger minds. I recall my thirteen year old self asking my dad about it, I have heard of it in the news, and as curious as I am, I wanted to know what they were talking about. My dad, did not wanted to scare me, but I can be certain that he actually was. Being an accountant and working in the financial department of a large company and having to face the uncertainty of losing all the stored information must be a pretty scary thing. Like I mentioned, he worked for a large company, how do you find the balance and manage a large corporation as a small one, especially in difficult situations like this one, when every single move is risky and I could result in a big expense for the company. Delegating responsibilities is a job made for a manager, who is in charge and knows better each and everyone of his followers. In the end, there is only one way to know if we will be successful, this is by taking a chance.

  55. My opinion that I found this article to be really interesting. I learned that small business are so successful because of their work ethic and structure. I mean that everyone has to have a role and knows exactly how to function in that role. In my opinion, handling team of individuals is one of the hardest adjustment for being a new manager. Moreover, one of the most significant challenge for new manager is to figure out what needs to be done to get the team working well together well and smoothly. The article shows us how high is important of communication and right leadership. I believe that the leadership with proper planning despite of what type of technology or process you are planning will be a key matter especially in this subject.

  56. Consistency is key for anyone trying to succeed but is especially necessary for leaders. Leaders must be consistent for themselves and for the members of the team. Leaders need to be there day in and day out for their team because the team will recognize this effort from the boss and in turn perform better. Another aspect of consistency is having the same temper and have an established decision making process. Teams suffer when the leader makes sporadic and uninformed decisions because he/she feels like it. This type of decision making makes the team focus on the leader when the should be focused on their goals and company goals. Another interesting part of the article was when you talked about how the consultants knew you were the boss and only interfered when you needed it or were going to make an ill-advised decision. This parallels with our knowing of completed staff work. They let you, the boss, worry about things you needed to worry about while the team came up with plans that could be easily implemented if decided to act upon them.

  57. Byambasuren Myagmar

    The lesson learned was that the technology was the easy part. The real challenge was in delegation and managing projects — through people — on time and on budget.

    That is exactly the textbook “Leadership: Enhancing the Lessons of Experience” was highlighting on some chapters. That delegation helps not the only leader but also followers get to grow. And positive feedback just after delegation is vital for both leader and follower.

    I took away from this article that says “Work gets done by people more than technology”. And for me, every leader or manager has weak or strength button that pops up in random situations. For me, being self -aware in emotional intelligence is one of the critical skill including delegation and technology adaption skill.

  58. This article brought up a good point in that to get the job done right you have to have trust in your coworkers and professional to get the job done. In the Y2k situation, there was a lot riding on the fact that when the year changed, there would not be serious issues that could harm the citizen of Virginia. Since the development of the internet, there had not been a huge year change anywhere close to the changing of the millennium, and this required a highly skilled and capable staff to get the job done.
    In many situations, including this one, hiring contractors in the best option to ensure the jobs get done correctly. There is a large difference between keeping the daily functions of software up and running and preparing the systems for the Y2k. As a manager and a leader, it is important to know when you are going outside of your comfort zone and knowledge to tackle certain situations. It was an excellent move on behalf of Gilmore to hire a contracting group to ensure everything would run smoothly. Going forward I will take the advice of this article and not be afraid to delegate tasks to others, like bringing in a company that specializes in a specific task or handing out projects to the people I work with. At the end of the day, you must be on time and on budget and the only way to do that is to work with your team members.

  59. Managing a business, whether it be a large or small one, requires certain leadership skills. One of the most important skills of a manager is to be able to delegate responsibilities to subordinates. It is easy to get caught up in the details of the work, and many people have the mindset that “if they want something done right they should do it themselves”. The key to fixing this issue is trusting your employees and the process they went through to get in that position. Many times they are the expert, as they have gone through detailed proper training to get the job done and can do it more quickly. The use of technology was another important topic brought up in this article. As technology is developing it can be hard to keep up with how to use it efficiently. When employees are trained to used specific software, they are able to get the job done more quickly. Overall, the best way to delegate responsibilities without getting anxious about it is to have faith in your employees, your team and your company. Whether it be a small or large business having a personal connection with employees will help it succeed.

  60. Bernardo Guillamon

    What I like about this article is how it highlights the importance of management. In the article, Professor Yoest was trying to focus on the “attention to detail” and working on things he shouldn’t have. This is a perfect example of the management technique of delegation. If Professor Yoest had known the importance of delegation, it would have yielded a greater output (even though nothing happened, and the goal was still met). Delegation increases efficiency and effectiveness within the organization by allowing the manager/leader to focus on what’s important- making the big decisions. The boss should never have to too much stuff on his desk and if the boss is not delegating the work, then it becomes the employee’s duty to anticipate and try to alleviate the workload, allowing for a more fluid organizational workflow and maximized productivity.

  61. It is interesting that the things we may consider the hardest part in a business say the accounting, technology, or financing etc. are actually a lot less complicated than some of the team work people encounter. Delegating and managing people is a challenge because interpersonal differences. Additionally, it is sometimes easier when working in a group to micromanage everyone so you know things are getting done right. However, it creates tension and a lack of trust within the team. The manager is suppose to make sure the team succeeds and works together through delegating.

  62. I found it very interesting how you found for yourself a key component to resolving this issue was managerial problem more so than a technical one. You note that you were lost in the weeds at times with your sleeves rolled up doing actual work as compared to managing others. I wonder to what degree your personal involvement and technical knowledge must be present in order to properly lead. While it is obviously detrimental to get lost in the weeds as a manager it appears you had some merit in doing so because this gave you a better understanding of the task and problem at hand. If you did not have this technical knowledge you likely would not have been able to lead and manage these individuals to accomplish your task. How can we as managers balance the line between micromanaging employees and ensuring the task at hand is completed as needs to be? Delegation is such a powerful, useful, and necessary tool for any organization so how can we maximize its multiplying effect while also ensuring great work is done? It seems as though a way must be created for managers to verify their employees work while not being overbearing.


    I do think that businesses would work better if people treated them like a small business like this article talks about. With what happened with the Y2k incident they worked together for the betterment of society to figure out what was going on and to make sure the 2-digit code didn’t reset when it went from 1990 to 2000. How often in life can we come together as a group to work for the better? I think a lot of us could do a lot of good by pitching in when others need help. Maybe this is just a dream, but I think working together is a great way to have everyone be successful.

  64. As highlighted in this article, the ability for a manager to delegate tasks is vital. It can be commonly misunderstood that a manager is supposed to know how to do everything in the company. Oftentimes, this is not the case. A manager is needed to lead and influence people to get work done. A good manager will have the influence and power to get subordinates to think critically and solve problems. This is directly related to the delegation of tasks. Putting trust in your employees will generate positive outcomes for the company, including greater job satisfaction, and increased productivity. It is important for managers to put people in the position who are trustworthy to make important decisions. This will allow employees to take on more responsibility, which will prepare them for future managerial roles.

  65. The advantage of managing a large corporation as a small business comes from the fact that all departments are under the same roof and can simultaneously and more effectively solve an issue; leading to less downtime resolving an issue. It is easier to manage people due to driving change being facilitated.I agree with Professor’s point on micromanagement and how little was accomplished when one individual focuses on a problem, rather than a group. It was interesting to read that saving the world from the Y2K apocalypse was not the hard part, but the management of people was. In a large corporation, it is hard to delegate people because many become a number, rather than a collaborative individual. This makes me think of the saying, “if you want something done right, then do it yourself” – Professor Yoest stayed keen when working and although he has an IT group, he was determined to find a solution to the problem at hand. You can have all the information needed to solve a problem, but if you don’t know how to manage the people providing the information, it becomes useless. Oftentimes, large corporations lack the ability to manage people and the information they can contribute.

  66. Isabel Rodriguez

    There is great importance in organization and the practice of communication. Both of these tools will allow for projects, assignments, or even just an average conversation to be completed efficiently. With this being said, these tools could be used alongside understanding a new topic or system all on your own. The topic at hand could always be explained by an external individual, but at the end of the day, it is you, and you alone, who needs to truly understand and pay close attention. These skills will not always be easy to master, however, if they are practiced, they can make an individual well rounded. Personally, I believe that being organized is a skill that will take you the farthest because with organization, you have the ability to work with others, complete tasks promptly, manage a group, etc. With this being said, I believe that anyone can manage a group with the ability to stay in control. I personally resonated with this article because I enjoy being organized and detail-oriented in my everyday school work and life. Therefore, I can truly agree, first hand, that all the skills previously mentioned are the keys to success in life.

  67. As we’ve been discussing throughout the course of your class, professor, managers must be able to delegate tasks in order for the organization to be effective and efficient. A lot of managers run into problems because they feel they must do everything themselves, but in reality, the purpose of having staff is so that the manager can delegate tasks to them. In doing so, the manager can focus on making strategic and long-term decisions for the business, and staffers are motivated because they are being assigned tasks that are vital to the performance of the company. Furthermore, these workers become much more knowledgeable and experienced, so when the boss is not present, things will still run just as smoothly as if he or she was in the office. In contrast, if these workers were only given simple, systematic tasks, they would be less inclined to work hard. Also, if the staff members perform delegated tasks effectively, it shows that the manager is successful, which results in promotion opportunities for both the manager and his or her staff. As the manager climbs the corporate ladder, his or her well-trained staff members will be able to fill in that position.

  68. One thing everyone knows in a business is that the manager has one very important task to do and that is to delegate. The manager needs to authorize his employees to the best of his ability so that those employees will succeed. Another component to this is the manager needs to be able to hire the right individuals because when the manager surrounds himself/herself with the right people then it will be much easier to delegate and ultimately find success. The manager cannot do all the tasks himself, so he needs his employees to pick up the slack and work on it together so that the company can have the best outcome. Delegating individuals is not something that is easy, but if you do it right, nothing is stopping you. Without delegating though, the management of the company will fall apart. This is because there is no one telling anyone what to do and this is a loss of order. This would mean that there would be a result of unfinished tasks and products. When delegating these employees, a manager has to keep in mind that some individuals are better at some tasks than others. So, the manager must authorize his employees carefully and this will lead to the best efficiency.

  69. This article provides a very interesting perspective in the fine that managers have to make in their decision making and leadership process. In a time like Y2K it was very easy for someone to get swept up in the commotion of the expected impending doom, and would make the already difficult job of managing a group of employees even tougher. The advice that the governor gave about dealing with subordinates as if they were part of a small team is really insightful. By dealing with managerial duties as if it was part of a small group managers gain the potential to have more trust in their employees, and it’s easier to establish a cohesive culture. Both of these would be very useful in the days leading up to Y2K because they were very stressful for everybody, and the companies that have a strong culture and high levels of trust are able to perform more efficiently in times of high stress or adversity. Additionally, in times like these it’s important for the manager to have faith in the abilities of his employees. Y2K must’ve been a scary time to be alive because any situation where there is talk about the world ending tensions get high. However, the stress of being a manager at the time definitely wouldn’t have made things easier.

  70. The title of the article is very interesting, since I never thought about how someone could run a big business like a small one. But after reading the article, I now understand the importance of everyone in a business doing their job correctly. Also, I believe that managers need to trust their employees so they can do their work right and at the same time everyone is being efficient. One takeaway from the reading is that managers have to learn how to run a big business like a small one. Managers have to make sure they are correctly delegating tasks and being efficient in the business project through their employees. I agree that technology is always part of our work day but we cannot always rely on it. That is why we have to always have strong work ethics and understand the importance of how to delegate tasks to be successful. Delegating and managing are skills that have to be developed for a manager to become successful at his position. If he knows how to delegate and manage, it will become easier for a business to be effective and efficient. I really enjoyed this article because it’s a great advice for business students. I have learned a tactical strategy, handling a big business like a small one. Business situations are solved with knowledge and practical solutions always aiming towards the end goal of the business.

  71. Gisselle Barreto

    Growing up, I remember my siblings telling me stories about how the whole world was losing it basically towards the end of the year in 1999. A lot of people went in hiding supposedly and were generally stocking up preparing for the worst. Nevertheless, nothing happened. I could not imagine if what Yoest described in the article were to have actually happened. Like hospitals and prisons losing their security breach or machines losing power. Especially, if all the water valves got mixed up-that would have been a nightmare. At that point, what else could you do but brace for impact? Better safe than sorry. At least Y2K was prepared if all went sideways. Amidst the chaos, I can see why Yoest would want to be hands on. However, I do like how he pointed out that it drew time from his actual job which was to manage his managers. I definitely agree with him that in high pressure situations like that it is important to listen to your experts and evaluate alternatives accordingly. Great insightful article!

  72. At the beginning of the reading, I found it difficult to accept that an individual could manage a big company simultaneously; the way small business are run. This article demonstrates that the initial cause of a small business is vital, and the reason is that all individuals are always working on a specific category. Still, in the end, they get the job completed on time. I appreciated the reading’s message since it proves that you have to work hard to get what you want to obtain the end goal desired. I found it interesting when the article mentioned technology was not the biggest worry; it was the easiest part, but the challenge depended on maintaining the actual projects. I believe it applies to tasks done today, too, since technology is not an issue; it is finding productive ways to utilize it.

  73. If someone told me that it is possible to run a big business like a small one, I would’ve said they were lying. This article taught me that I was wrong about such a thing. I learned that big companies can be managed like small ones. In the article attention to detail is mentioned, but the staff working at the time called it micromanaging. I can see the importance behind attention to detail especially when given such an important task. If you’re starting at a new job and the manager gives you a job to do, you’re not going to breeze through it with no attention to detail. If you don’t pay attention to detail and you manage to mess something up, you’ll get fired. When managing a big company like you would a small business, I now understand how important trust is within the business. Attention to detail is very important, but so is being able to trust your employees. A manager must be able to delegate tasks to certain staff members in order to get more tasks done in a shorter period of time. There has to be a level of trust between the staff and a manager when it comes to a business or else the business may fail. It seems to me that without trust, the company wouldn’t be able to perform to its full capability.

  74. Esmeralda Sevilla

    I found this article really interesting. I imagine that managing a team through a crisis is not easy. A good manager needs to keep calm to make the right decisions. If you do not think clearly, then you are going to make bad decisions. I also believe that a manager cannot solve a problem on their own that is why delegating tasks is very important; this will help get the job done throughout the organization. A problem might occur when managers think that employees cannot do the job as well as they can. That is why a manager needs to trust their team, and if they do that, they will see that the staff will get the task done. Trust is an essential part of the process; a manager needs to trust their employees to get the job done. Also, delegation gives the opportunity for the staff to flourish their abilities and skills. Through delegating powers, the team gets a feeling of importance and gets motivated to work and provide good results. Also, efficiency arises when duties are transferred to people, helping a manager plan better and be relieved from heavy workload. As mentioned before, if a manager trusts themselves and their team, he/she will be amazed by how efficiently the team can come up with ideas to solve a problem faster. Delegation leads to better decisions; that is why I think that delegation is the way to success!

  75. The Y2k bug was a computer bug that caused problems for dates after December 1999. Since many people thought that the world would end before the year 2000, Professor Yoest and his organization tried to combat the Y2k bug and technology was becoming more advanced in the year 2000. Many of the staff were under pressure to combat it because the world and their careers were at stake, also the uncertainty of the Y2K bug was putting people on edge leading to millennium madness.

    Professor Yoest had a hard time doing some tasks because he was a small business owner and didn’t deal with large organizations and was used to micromanaging. However, in the end, Virginia spent 215 million dollars and exterminated the Y2K bug. Many staff realized that the problem was solved and that the problem seemed bigger than it actually was. The only struggle was having a deadline, a budget, and managing people and projects. but everything else, including the technology part, was easy for them.

  76. Though NYE in 1999 may not have been fun for those working to keep the world afloat, I can imagine that the parties were definitely fun to be at. I loved how this article portrays the very real sense of danger that was felt by the world towards a situation that people now chuckle at when reminiscing. I also have often found myself struggling with the art of delegating tasks. In certain predicaments, when there is not much work to be done, delegating tasks is not needed. I would rather do the work myself because I know for a fact that it will be completed. However, once the workload becomes too heavy, trust in fellow employees must be a factor. Running a large corporation as though it was a small business may sound difficult at first; however, it can be done. Whether or not a company is efficient is based largely on a managers mindset towards managing their employees. If a manager feels that he can trust his employees, the company will succeed because the manager will be able to delegate many tasks. This will lead to a good relationship between the manager and the employees because the manager will not be as stressed as usual.

  77. The idea of running a big business like a small one has never really crossed my mind, probably because I didn’t think it was possible. But, I can see why this method can be effective after reading this article. There’s a hierarchy in businesses, and managers or leaders need to use it to their advantage. They are the ones who manage other managers, who then manage other managers, and then other employees. The idea of delegating can be scary to many people, I know it is for me. There isn’t anyone that you’ll trust like yourself, and I actually often find myself checking after other people’s work to make sure it was done the right way, or at least the way that’s right in my mind. But this defeats the whole purpose of having a team behind you. Not to mention it would be downright impossible in this type of situation. This is a really important lesson that anyone who wants to own or lead a business needs to learn. Stepping away from what you may think as just being “detail-oriented,” will allow for the company to be ran effectively where people are productive and the amount of work being done is maximized.

  78. There have been plenty of stories that I have heard about the world coming to an end, but 1999 is one that stood out the most to me. The way that you describe how people were acting and reacting to the news of the end of the world is shocking and nevertheless, scary. It is shocking to me to hear that it is possible to run a big business like a small one. However, it does make sense. If the focus stays on the mission of the company by delegating tasks, paying close attention to detail, having a clear head with as much information as possible to make good decisions, and so on, there will be an overall success for the company, big or small. By going through the cray situation that you did, I found it interesting how you mention that the technology was the easy part but delegating and managing projects was the hard part. I believe that it is so important in a company as a manager to be able to trust all employees so that they can have certain jobs that will eventually build their confidence. By them being successful and therefore confident, the company expands its talent and resources and becomes a better overall company.

  79. This was an extremely interesting article because it makes something so complicated become very simple. When you think about big businesses, you think that is nearly impossible to have your operations run smoothly. However, this article puts it into a different perspective. This article says that a big business is like running a small business. By treating a large business as a small business, it shows that everyone and all leaders are still under one roof and they if everyone works together as a team, their operations are still able to run smoothly. When you hear large business, it can sound quite intimidating, but it all boils down to the same process and if everyone works together, then they can be successful. The second point that stood out to me is that you can have the smartest people and all the information needed, but if you can’t be organized or able to delegate then nothing will get done. As a manager, organization is key because if you aren’t organized then you aren’t able to delegate tasks to the proper people. A manager cannot do everything by themselves, so the team needs to be able to work together so they can perform efficiently.

  80. Making sure a business is operating smoothly is not an easy task for anyone to complete. As a manager during a crisis or a big problem there can be many things that do not go your way, but the best way to deal with so is being calm and confident. This way everyone on the job buys into what you’re trying to accomplish and then they gain the managers trust. This can go a long way especially when it comes to employees efficiency in the workplace. Running a big business like a small one seems like an unlikely way to be successful but it does work. Keeping a close bond and relationship will go a long way in gaining your employees trust and work ethic. Overall, I find this article to be very interesting and different, it throws different perspectives and ways to keep employees on track and successful. My takeaway from this is, as a manager there are different ways to gain efficiency in the workplace and gaining trust and having confidence is a main route of success.

  81. This article was very interesting to read. I think that the main take away from this article is that you can’t control everything that happens in this world but the one thing that you do have control over is the way that you act and handle your team of people around you. In this article it talks about a universal bug that was supposedly going to destroy the internet and how the government took action to make sure that it didn’t destroy the entire worlds network. When looking back it can be seen that no matter what happened, if the disaster happened or not, the biggest feat to overcome was the delegation of the people involved in trying to control the bug. In any group of people, whether it be a company or the government, the delegation of people is the deciding factor on whether or not your group will succeed. Without a well-functioning team behind you as a leader then you will get nowhere and information will fall through the cracks. As a leader you must control your employees well and everything else will fall into place. The hardest part of any project will always be the people.

  82. When in charge of an important task, it is important to make sure everyone is on the same page and will complete their task(s). 99% of the things could go according to plan, but if one person does not do their job, it ruins the whole operation for the entire company. In this article, the unpredictability of what was going to happen to the internet cause great cancer. Yet, the only thing you can stay on top of is the effectiveness of you and your company. One way to help with that is by building trust with your employees. If your employees trust you and know you have their back even if things get messed up, it will give them a built-in sense of comfort. If an outside force messes with your operation and it does not work according to plan, you have to adjust accordingly. But, with that in mind, also know that you did everything you were supposed to and the plans were ruined by something else. It is so hard to expect the unexpected, yet if you and your employees are ready to adjust, that is the best way to prepare them.

  83. Ever since I enrolled for this class, I realized how much management skills are underrated (at least on my part) We see people on their LinkedIn profile adding “management” under the “skills” section but the reality is, most of us only the superficial surface of management and what it takes to be a manager. This article offers great insights – by showing that the manager was not a tech-savvy guru but using his knowledge of team-work and human behavior, he was able to add what the team was really missing – someone to coordinate tech-savvy and non-tech-savvy teams. It takes a lot of work to improvise in stressful situations and there one should be able to tailor his skills and logic to each situation

  84. This article shows one of the greatest examples of communication you can find. As someone who possibly wants to look for a career in high-tech sales, I directly related to the dilemma of not understanding the technology that I may have to sell. Although technology can seem intimidating and confusing for those who have worked in business their whole lives, I believe Professor Yoest has a great point that the hardest part is truly managing these operations. If a team can not work together in a cohesive unit, the technology that is being applied has no directly implication. If there is no plan of action, the people who know how to work and operate the technology will not even have an opportunity to display their abilities.

  85. Whether we are discussing technology or any other matter, leadership and teamwork are not easy. Besides needing proper communication skills, one must have the ability to manage. To manage something or someone does not mean to simply exercise your opinion and or boss people around. If that is what it means to manage, people would volunteer every time and Professor Yoest would not be writing this article. Though I was very young at the time this article refers to, the points about leadership are strong and relevant even today. Regardless of what position you start out in, delegation and communication are two of the hardest learning curves for any leader. For a select few, this talent comes easily, but for many it takes years to become even somewhat comfortable in these areas. It was not wrong for Professor Yoest to have these concerns at the time. I appreciate that Professor Yoest mentions ‘micromanaging’ and ‘attention-to-detail’ as two separate concepts, because they are. To micromanage means to control to a point where there is no room for outside mistakes or changes – you control the situation. Being attentive to detail means paying extra attention to everything you do, but mistakes may still be made. A good manager should be attentive to detail without controlling every specific, acknowledging that mistakes can still occur.

  86. This article shows the clear dangers of micromanagement, no business can function like that. It is key for businesses to have a more liberal regime. This article also emphasizes the need for clear communication, the example shown helps a great deal in understanding this need. Technology may seem difficult, but is also very important for business today. I can see the issues with technology with some of the professors in online classes, but it is necessary, the needs of communication are very important for smooth business operation. The technology, communication, and teamwork, without the limiting factors of micro management are very important.

  87. Under such intense pressure, with the threat of the world ending, I imagine the difficulty of being a leader is multiplied. In such a circumstance, it is understandable that you would want to have everything under control. However, you are not working alone; in this case, our dear professor had some of the best equipped people in the world to deal with this problem. So, it is critical to simply give a sense of direction and structure, they can handle the tiny details. Micromanaging not only makes it more difficult to look at the bigger picture, it creates a culture of mistrust between the manager and the managed. I believe that all of this occurred because of intense pressure, but this article taught me that the threat can sometimes be worse than the actual problem. I imagine our professor nearly went mad thinking about what would happen and how awful it would be, which led to mistakes. All of this from a threat of a disaster, not an actual disaster.

  88. Before reading this article I honestly had no idea how bad December 31, 1999 must’ve been. Everyone really thought the world was ending when the year 2000 came around. For someone who was born in 1999 it is really weird to think that the year I was born was also the year that everyone thought that the world was going to end. Honestly I don’t really like knowing this, it’s messing with my head a bit haha. The way Jack Yoest described the year 2000 as a year of unknown unknowns really puts into perspective how scared everyone must have been during this time. I could not imagine everyone walking around all the time scared about the unknowns as if we did not get a new year every 365 days. I really do not ever want to be in the shoes of someone who has to be held responsible for all things pertaining to Y2K. Just the mere fact that it was a $5 billion dollar enterprise that was in the Virginia system meant to aid the Health and Human Resources. That seems like an unappealing task and definitely must have been tricky to get under order. I really am glad I was only 6 months old at this point in my life.

  89. After reading the article one thing that comes to mind is that sometimes leadership roles don’t mean that you are an expert in that field. Coming on in a role like this may be challenging at first but if comes down to how you manage. The team you work with was hired or is experienced in the field itself already. It comes down to how you can shape them to be the best they can be. Leadership and management are both skills. Some people have them and some don’t. That is okay because that is the whole point of working on a team. Each person is efficient at certain things and if all the parts are working correctly the team succeeds. In the article it was obvious this was a stressful situation. The key to handling situations like this is to remain calm so the team remains calm. A true leader would never show weakness to his/her group because the rest of the team feeds off that energy and could be damaging. The skills we are learning with in this course are exactly the tools we need to be able to handle a leadership role. In the real world nothing is guaranteed and you will not be able to be an expert at everything.

  90. Chris Talamini-Kelemen

    Running a large organization as if it were a small business has interesting implications, and I agree and disagree with the concept. The reality is that it often depends on the circumstances, and each organization is different. On a large scale, I think this concept is true because the principles and concepts that apply to managing a small business also apply to managing a larger organization.

    However, I think there is one important contrast between the two management styles: communication. When considering communication, it is important to note that miscommunication increases when there are more levels (or channels) that information has to travel through. In a small business, if the owner/manager communicates information to the entire staff, everyone receives the information in the exact same manner. On the contrary, in a larger organization, the owner/manager might tell the employees on their team, who then direct the information to the employees on their own individual teams; in this situation, the employees at the lowest levels are receiving the same information, but it is communicated in a different manner. Since every person perceives information uniquely (due to their own individualism), the information often becomes distorted. This is one reason why the concept of feedback is important to ensuring the accuracy of horizontal and vertical communication. When managing a larger organization, this principle is something important for managers to consider.

  91. Running a large organization as a small organization seems like a true challenge, and an unwise decision to manage resources, which will not only run the organization inefficiently, but it will also violate one of the 4 catholic social principles: subsidiarity.
    Subsidiarity is a social principle that establishes that a “Community of a higher order should not interfere in the internal life of a community of a lower order, depriving the latter of its functions, but rather should support it in case of need and help to coordinate its activity with the activities of the rest of society, always with a view to the common good”
    The delegation, then, becomes an important fundamental in any organization. Moises was one of the first to discover the power of delegation by appointing judges to decide minor cases for him and to bring any big dispute to him. In delegating Moses not only found more time to concentrate on a more important issue, but also led the way to succession in case he dies.
    Nowadays nearly every large organization, from a corporate firm like apple to the Catholic Church relies on delegation trying to follow the principle of subsidiarity. These large corporations do so, because they have found that delegating, and not micromanaging, to be effective.

  92. While reading this article, I found it merely impossible for any person to single-handedly lead a large organization. This has nothing against Professor Yoest as I’m sure he did a marvelous job. I like the central idea of this message as it states that every business should be run like a small business. Where every small company has individual expectations for every employee, and these expectations help lead the company to success. Paying close attention is important because every employee is important. This leads back to the four developments of team processes where trust and cohesion in the workplace are important. In order to maintain these processes you must run your business like a small business, in order to maximize efficiency.

  93. This article is an interesting metaphor to make the very true point that it is always about being both on-time and on-budget. I thought the article gave a great example and something that my parents have told me a lot about. Y2K was a worldwide phenomenon that said that technology would be finished in the year 2000. It was a new millennium, a new time, and everything was going to change. While we would find out this was not true at all, there were many companies that prepared for a technological shutdown. Obviously, Professor Yoest’s company was one of these companies. This put him in a tough spot as an inexperienced business leader that had not run a big company before. However, the advice the governor of Virginia gave him was very good and I’m sure holds true today. “Pick a small team and run them as a small business. It will be the same except with more zeros.” It helps a business owner just to keep things as simple as possible and not complicate things if he/she does not need to. This way, if the business is simple, the problems are usually simple as well. Simple problems require simple solutions.

  94. This article is very interesting as it talks about the end of the world and the y2k problem that fueled this fear. Y2k is the belief that technology would be finished and would not carry over to the year 2000. Preparations began all over the country as people were preparing for the end. Businesses and organizations were forced to prepare for the worst. Our Management Professor during this tragedy had to start to think about the worst-case scenario. As a young inexperienced manager, in charge of this company, our management professor was not ready to make that decision. In an Organization, when tragedy and hardships occur, just like this example of Y2k, a leader must think about the company and the betterment of his employees. To truly handle these issues in the right manner, as a leader or manager we must remain calm and try to weather the storm so to say. People are faced with problems every day and a good manager reacts and fixes the problem that has occurred while remaining calm and keeping the best interest of the organization in mind. We might not be able to prepare for every problem that is thrown our way in the workplace or in society. Running a large organization especially in a time like this must’ve been very hard. There was a lot of uncertainty in the world.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *