“Spam King” Faces Hard Time, Fines

Spam King

He’s been called the “Spam King,” and now his reign is at an end. There’s no better reminder to avoid spamming and other illegal and unethical marketing techniques. The cautionary story of Stanford Wallace is one to remember.

Wallace, 47, of Las Vegas, pleaded guilty recently in federal court to accessing roughly 500,000 Facebook accounts. Federal authorities say he used them to send unsolicited ads in the guise of friend requests.

Wallace is charged with fraud criminal contempt, and faces up to three years in prison and a $250,000 fine, NBC News reports.

The FBI says Wallace began spamming Facebook users in November 2008, and sent 27 million spam messages over the next four months. He was indicted in San Jose, California, in 2011.

An official FBI release says charges spring from both fraud and violating a judge’s previous order to stay away from Facebook. Authorities say Wallace maintained a profile there under the name “David Frederick-Sinful Fridays.”

But Wallace’s spamming career predates Facebook and even social media. According to Ars Technica, he began in the 1990s with a company called Cyber Promotions.

Ars Technica’s Nate Anderson writes:

“Wallace first spammed fax machines and then moved on to e-mail, believing that he had a legal right to market his wares as he saw fit. Dubbed ‘Spamford’ by opponents, he eventually embraced the nickname and even registered the domain spamford.com.”

Wallace spent the 1990s fighting lawsuits from AOL and other Internet service providers. (Anderson notes that Hormel — the makers of the Spam meat product — also wrote him a letter objecting to “spamford.com.”)

In 2004, the FTC filed suit against Wallace and collected a $4 million judgement two years later.

Facebook wasn’t the only social network Wallace targeted. He and partner Walter Rines had a plan to spam MySpace users, directing them to websites selling adult dating services and ringtones.

As Anderson writes, Wallace sent 860,000 messages by logging into about 300,000 users’ MySpace accounts. He was the subject of 800 complaints. In 2007, MySpace sued both Rines and Wallace, and the FTC went after them for violating an earlier injunction. But Wallace was defiant:

“During his deposition with Frankel, the FTC lawyer, Wallace insisted that the messages he sent to other MySpace users weren’t ‘unsolicited’ at all. This was the beauty of sending links from one MySpace user to the user’s friends. ‘A message between two friends is not defined as ‘unsolicited’ by several standards,’ Wallace said. ‘If I call you up tomorrow and ask you if you’d like me to send you a document, is that an unsolicited phone call, or do we have an existing relationship?'”

Courts didn’t seem to buy his argument. By 2011, Wallace had wracked up nearly $1 billion in judgments against him in cases involving spam on MySpace and Facebook.

Wallace is free on bond and scheduled to be sentenced on Dec. 7.

Image: Sanford Wallace/Google+


Tom Coombe Tom Coombe is a staff writer for Small Business Trends and has been a professional writer for over 15 years, spending most of that time covering news in the Lehigh Valley. He's worked as a reporter for the Allentown Morning Call and an editor for AOL's Patch.com news service. Tom has also freelanced for WFMZ, the Produce Marketing Association and a number of other publications.

4 Reactions
  1. These are the kinds of people that give internet marketers a bad name. While I have a hard time sending this kind of person to prison (since he’s not violent) it’s obvious that without very heavy-handed supervision he’ll continue his behavior.

    • Hi Robert,
      We’re not sure we’re down with the penalties for this kind of behavior either. But it’s helpful for anyone who’s ever marketed anything — and that’s most small business owners — to be reminded how this stuff is viewed by the general public and the law enforcement community.

  2. This shows that whatever you do, it catches up to you in the long run. You may get by in a few years. But if you don’t set things straight, it has a way of getting back at you. Somehow, some way.